Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bird automatic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 08:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Bird automatic

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a none notable band with one independent EP-self funded thing, no third party source material bar revies, and a series of seemingly non-notable tours? SGGH speak! 13:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  14:29, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- Mattinbgn\talk 22:15, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, although there are a lot of websites which talk about the band. Perhaps if the band becomes more notable, maybe releasing some albums, then the article could be rewritten. ''' ɷ i m b u s a n i a 22:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep On the basis of their national touring, plus JJJ radioplay and "unearthed" status, just about gets them over the line re WP:MUSIC Murtoa (talk) 22:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, Being an "Unearthed" band is probably enough to pass criteria #9 of WP:MUSIC, albeit only just. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:51, 3 October 2008 (UTC).
 * Keep: numerous independent references to the band, radio airplay on Triple J and 'unearthed status'. Dan arndt (talk) 05:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.