Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birdeye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Birdeye

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I am using AFD as PROD is likely to be contested, and some of the references might be borderline on notability. References used are mostly routine coverage of the company - such as the company getting funding or launching a new feature. The company being featured in one of the awards didn't establish notability, as it is only mentioned in passing. In my opinion, this does not satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and failed WP:GNG. Thank you. &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   00:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Internet, Software,  and United States of America.   &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;     (contact)   00:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete plenty of links for the frozen food company with a similar name, this company has only PR sources. Oaktree b (talk) 02:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel 5969  TT me 12:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per Nom and user Oaktree b., promotional article with PR sourcing.  --  Otr500 (talk) 15:14, 2 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.