Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birdon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Ultraman Taro.  MBisanz  talk 04:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Birdon

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is about a creature in a television program that does not seem to be notable enough to merit an article of its own. It seems like just mentioning it in the article of the programs would be sufficient. Nick—Contact/Contribs 04:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to main TV show article, or character list article, as appropriate. Easy call.  This is a minor character in a TV show with no independent notability.  Article could be deleted, but a better call would be to redirect it to the main show article, or to a character list for that show if appropriate.  The advantage of a redirect is that it has a lower likelyhood of recreation in the future, as it directs editors to edit the more appropriate articles instead.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  05:47, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 10:58, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment . If notability can't be established, the redirect target is Ultra Monsters, where Birdon is already listed. • Gene93k (talk) 11:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ultra Monsters. Aside from a sentence or two of plot summary, the list covers the topic. Notability from the real world is not established. • Gene93k (talk) 12:52, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Jay32183 (talk) 22:56, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * redirect as a plausible search term. Ryan 4314   (talk) 05:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.