Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birkett Long LLP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The only keep argument cited User:Bearian/Standards, which as a user essay, bears little weight,    -- RoySmith (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Birkett Long LLP

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Advertising. Awards are very weak. On the other hand they sometimes donate to charity. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:59, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per User:Bearian/Standards. This firm is fairly large, and has been around for almost 200 years.  Their charitable work is a trival non sequitur. Bearian (talk) 18:41, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see sufficient independent sources that indicate notability. Obviously their charitable giving is of no consequence here. Shadowjams (talk) 13:51, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, probably very good at what they do, but I'm not seeing the sort of substantial third-party coverage that would indicate they meet WP:CORP. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.