Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birmingham Magicians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 17:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Birmingham Magicians

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable semi-pro basketball team that only lasted for 1 season. Note, American Basketball Association in this case refers to American Basketball Association (2000–present), not the original American Basketball Association that merged with the NBA. Natg 19 (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are non-notable semi-pro teams:




 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 23:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 00:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete A few brief mentions in newspapers and books, but not what I would call significant coverage. Nwlaw63 (talk) 07:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I probably would have WP:PRODDED them first, and if any of them were contested, take them here individually. Since there hasn't been any keep !votes yet, they probably would have been deleted by now. Nevertheless, I took a look at each of them, and I agree with the nominator's rationale to delete. Tavix | Talk  15:47, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete all Very few ABA 2000 teams have achieved enough stability to deserve Wikipedia articles. There's very little of substance here. (Frankly, I'm not even sure one could come up with a reliably-sourced list of all the ABA 2000 teams that have existed over time. It's a bizarre league.) Zagal e jo^^^ 04:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.