Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birmingham Temple


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Non-admin closure. Nominated by socks. Already leading towards consensus. (non-admin closure) -- DQ  (t)   (e)  20:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Birmingham Temple

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete - Article not needed because information already at Humanistic Judaism Humanistic Ron (talk) 13:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Delete - As per nomination. --Antwerpen Synagoge (talk) 19:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. Although the article is currently skimpy, this congregation is notable as the first secular humanist Jewish congregation, and covered as such as many books and news sources..  (A few examples:) This is not the same topic as Humanistic Judaism any more than Congregation Kahal Kadosh Beth Elohim is the same as Reform Judaism (North America).--Arxiloxos (talk) 20:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - The sources provided by Arxiloxos does demonstrate enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. What concerns me more is the nom, an account created less than 5 days ago, has been concentrating on deleting Humanistic Judaism ‎related content with already 3 AfDs on the topic. --Oakshade (talk) 21:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. Two of the above editors (the nominator and Antwerpen Synagoge) have been identified and blocked as sockpuppets of the same blocked editor, see Sockpuppet investigations/אֶפְרָתָה/Archive. Rmhermen (talk) 14:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.