Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Birth defects considered snazzy by the FDA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted (by me). &mdash;Xezbeth 17:04, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Birth defects considered snazzy by the FDA
Speaks for itself. Speedy tag removed by author (who also likes to push the snazzy angle on Doc Hammer). Danny Lilithborne 06:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Birth defects aren't snazzy. Baseball,Baby!   balls  •  strikes  06:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep it You'd be surprised. Hazelfo
 * Comment I probably would, but you and your pals wanting an article isn't reason enough to keep it. Danny Lilithborne 08:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  Cute but useless Chris Griswold 07:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep As per Hazelfo. --72.12.30.143 07:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete ....wow Konman72 07:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense. Fabricationary 08:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense (I see my edit conflict said exactly as Fabricationary - well said!) Agent 86 08:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete this mess. Unless "snazzy" is an official FDA term, then this is subjective tripe. Wryspy 09:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense and insufficient context (not to mention somewhat insensitive). I checked the FDA website to be safe, and "snazzy" is not use to describe birth defects.-- danntm T C 13:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This is not patent nonsense nor is it an article without insufficient context. If it had insufficient context, danntm wouldn't have known what web site to check.  It if were patent nonsense, Wryspy would not have comprehended it in order to know that it was subjective.  Please do not abuse the speedy deletion criteria. This article is, as danntm says, original research, propounding as it does the novel concept of "snazzy birth defects". Delete. Uncle G 13:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Phrase has also been repeatedly re-inserted into Doc Hammer in violation of WP:3RR. Pointless. --Pagana 14:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, nonsense, and not even snazzy nonsense. NawlinWiki 14:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. But I've enough of the Spirit of the Troll in me to admit that the title made me smile.  Smerdis of Tlön 14:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense, and warn the editor who created the article accordingly. --Metropolitan90 14:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of the listed conditions are present at birth (and all the other reasons). Nuttah68 14:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove the sticks up your asses.
 * Snazzy delete Wildthing61476 16:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.