Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biruaca


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy keeping. I'm taking "already realized I made a mistake" as a tacit request to withdraw the AFD. That, combined with two speedy keeps, is good enough for me. If he wants to renominate it, then so be it. --Golbez 16:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Biruaca
Delete. One, only Apure links to it. Two, judging by Google it's not a very noteworthy city. Three, I believe a red link would spur editors to create a stub or perhaps even an article more noteworthy than this one... With love, Jobjörn (Talk | contribs) 23:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, I should mention that most of the other cities in the Apure State have articles like this one. If this one "succeeds" the nomination (i e, gets deleted), I'll nominate those too. Otherwise, no point, aye? Jobjörn (Talk | contribs) 23:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * strong speedy keep. if we keep villages with population of under ten in the us and uk then surely a whole city is plenty notable enough.  BL Lacertae -  kiss the lizard  00:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * speedy angry super keep - the time you spent on noting for deletion you could have used to improve the stubs. Why do we have people like Jörn here? I stick to Jimbo : content of WP must be verifiable. The noteworthy rule is ridiculous. WP is not paper. I don't believe that you wrote with love. Your actions produces hate at my side. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 16:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Jesus christ. Too much coffee? Hey, I've already realized I made a mistake, no need for you to shove it down my throat. As a matter of fact, I was just being bold. Peace out, man! Jobjörn (Talk | contribs) 16:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, but note Tobias should maintain civility. --Golbez 16:40, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * [EDIT conflict. Hey folks I wrote when you were writing. But you were faster in saving :-) Here my text again:] I am sorry for my harsh note. Jörn said it was his first AFD. I had some bad experience with AFD, and did not see it on enWP for a long time. Hope enWP stays this way. Jörn, sorry again to you. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 16:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.