Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biscuit Belly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Biscuit Belly

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Procedural nomination per RfD outcome. Pinging participants who may want to join this discussion. ,, and. CycloneYoris talk! 23:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CycloneYoris talk! 23:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CycloneYoris talk! 23:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:DICDEF. I don't see any use for a redirect, either. — rsjaffe</b> 🗣️ 00:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I oppose the redirect as it was because it did not seem to make a ton of sense or have high usage and a soft redirect to wiktionary would be impossible as the term is not on Wiktionary. <b style="color: #ea5a5a;">Tartar</b>Torte 02:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as dicdef, negologism, and pretty much nonsense. Can't help wondering if this exists only in order to host that external link... --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, Per above, nonsense material. Alex-h (talk) 14:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Inadequate content present, does not follows the notability criteria. Timetraveller80 (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.