Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bisexuality in Brazil

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Bisexuality in Brazil
This is simply a non verifiable personal opinion. Following this user's contributions around is providing great fodder for our deletion campaign. I urge you all to do the same!
 * Delete Agreed. Groeck 06:30, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As above. Nowhither 06:38, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. And that's all that really needs to be said. CanadianCaesar 06:43, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the above --Mysidia (talk) 07:16, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN Kappa 07:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Paul Klenk 08:01, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for sure. --Bhadani 12:40, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN out of all the X in Brasil/X in Brazil articles, this one's seems to be the funniest, but only in context with the other articles. Roodog2k 14:13, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I do agree and it is mischievous also. --Bhadani 14:17, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Dottore So 14:29, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete : Let's vote Wikibrah as the cutest vandal we've got on wikipedia. He's a borderline vandal, he knowingly adds crap here. I wonder if the admins find this cute... Manik Raina 15:24, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't personally find this cute. It reads like a Weekly World News article. Fernando Rizo T/C 18:26, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- DS1953 01:03, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non encyclopedic material. Elfguy 02:48, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, of course. This is just nonsense. TheMadBaron 18:52, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete.  ral  315  17:57, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd have to say that, as the evidence mounts, I now regard this as just another prank by a known vandal. No attempt at encyclopedic content, despite many attempts to assume good faith and help the perpetrator understand what that means. So the other possibility is, it's just a series of jokes and should be treated as such. Andrewa 00:22, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, for what little it's worth: While the quality and POV of this page is seriously sub-par, the topic is quite encyclopedic. I took an Anthropology class a year ago, a signifigant portion of which was devoted to the sexuality of Brazil, which stands in great contrast to that of the U.S., and is really quite an interesting topic worthy of inclusion. If the author could start a more neutral page (i.e. Sexuality of Brazil), I would be happy to furnish him with notes and references. &#8669;Casito&#8669;Talk 05:05, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Good suggestion. You don't seem to be claiming that there is any useful content here to save, and IMO there isn't, it would be much easier to start again. Perhaps there is even enough encyclopedic information available for an article on bisexuality in Brazil, but a more general article is the place to start. No change of vote. Andrewa 20:26, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is an RfC against User:Wiki brah at present precisely because of articles like this.  I and several other users are simply out of patience.  Andrewa sums up my feelings pretty well at this point. - Lucky 6.9 17:36, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.