Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishop Gilson levi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 12:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Bishop Gilson levi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotional article. No relevant hits in Google News for "Bishop Gilson". SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment You know, this really needs an initial cleanup before I can really render good input on it--it looks like such a structural mess, it's hard to tell what is going on. I don't see any notability here, but that doesn't mean it might not exist elsewhere. Jclemens (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Thoroughly promotional in tone, no assertion of notability, the only page written by its creator, and the content is a mess.  --Lockley (talk) 14:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * NB: Previously deleted by ProD in May 2008: see [] Springnuts (talk) 15:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as no WP:RS. Springnuts (talk) 15:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Restored Covenant Churches of God is a movement of which I have never read or heard. This makes me think that it is in fact a minor splinter group and hence NN.  If that were not the case I would have expected WP to have an article Restored Covenant Churches of God, but there is not.  The European head of a NN denomination must also be NN.  Even their own website seems thin on detail.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 01:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.