Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishop John Wynn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. T. Canens (talk) 01:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Bishop John Wynn

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Borderline promotional piece for a minister without a clear assertion of notability or an independent source that has covered him. Contested PROD. — Jeff G. ツ 02:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete, notability not established, Google check reveals nothing other than promotional pieces. Sea photo Talk  04:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried a clear up and to find sources, but essentialy nothing notable here despite the assertations in the article at various stages of it's development. Also the account creating this clearly has a WP:COI (that in itself is not a reason to delete, but just adds to the impression this is a puff piece). Essentialy most if not all information comes from the pastor's own website which is not a WP:RS. Pedro : Chat  07:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete promotional piece on non-notable clergy Vartanza (talk) 08:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. The article fails to demonstrate the notability of the subject. Yes, there is a COI/promotion issue in place, but the language of the article is neutral enough that it's not a candidate for speedy deletion as spam. —C.Fred (talk) 14:49, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note to closer: You may want to check the contributions of when this AfD is concluded to make sure there are no duplicate articles. I just deleted Bishop John Wynn (International Church Fellowship) under CSD criterion A10 as a copy of this article. —C.Fred (talk) 14:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: promotional, unsourced, no indication of notability, extremely POV language ("His mother has served faithfully in ministry", "Bishop John Wynn is a devoted father of eight beautiful children", etc.). -- Radagast 3 (talk) 05:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not really seeing notability here. Indeed, while the WP:COI and WP:PEACOCK issues aren't reasons in and of themselves for a delete, it does seem to add credence that it is a promotional article. -- Surv1v4l1st (Talk 19:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.