Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishopswood school


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. I'm closing as keep due to consensus and the policy advanced arguments advanced, but this article really needs to be expanded. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Bishopswood school

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable elementary school, per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Drm310 (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment It's actually tripartite, nursery, primary (= infant and junior) and secondary (= high) http://www.bishopswoodschool.co.uk/ The www.bishopswood-inf.hants.sch.uk one is 'elementary' (infant and junior), but is not a special needs school, which the one referred to in the article is. Peridon (talk) 17:40, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment If it has notability, the current article doesn't establish it. Unless someone plans on making some serious improvements, it probably should be deleted. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 18:29, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I think I blocked them for user name before they got very far. They haven't had time to regroup and request a change or start a new account yet. Peridon (talk) 18:37, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep The subject is notable, being discussed in detail in sources such as The Making of the Inclusive School and Policies for Diversity in Education. It is our editing policy to nuture such weak starts, not to delete them. Andrew D. (talk) 19:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - While I can't see the first link, I'm satisfied with the second that this school passes the school SNG as a model school, even if it does not include secondary-age students. If it does include the latter, it is a slam-dunk. Carrite (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I can see the first link now, and it does indicate that this school included secondary school students. Carrite (talk) 20:44, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article is piss-poor and even that is an understatement but...... I come bearing gifts - They're not perfect but meh it's better than nothing. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:02, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.