Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitKinex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 07:23, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

BitKinex

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I found no significant coverage. This software is non-notable. SL93 (talk) 22:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep shows that it is a 'recognized' software with many users. It also have 135000 hits on Google, plus major mentions on minor websites.  Kinkreet ~&#9829;moshi moshi&#9829;~ 00:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * None of that shows notability per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 00:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - no references, no indication of notability for this software (cnet and google hits do not establish notability, as mentioned above), created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 13:34, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unsourced, fails WP:GNG. WP:GHITS don't convey notability, and I couldn't find anything online that showed any notability.  The CNet link is a download mirror; not independent for the purposes of establishing any sort of notability. - SudoGhost 18:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as having no independent coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:30, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.