Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitLife


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:01, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

BitLife

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page is just WP:CRUFT. My BEFORE turned up no reliable sources except the Newsweek article that's already referenced, but I'm not even sure about its suitability because it does not seem independent of the subject. All the other references are from Twitter and Reddit. Fails WP:GNG. Even if GNG can somehow be established, which I doubt, I would still say to delete per WP:TNT.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 03:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.   Bait30   Talk 2 me pls? 03:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom (WP:TNT). Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 21:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG. Even if sufficient sources are found, kill it with fire as the others have suggested. Woodroar (talk) 22:06, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete even the better sources aren't offering any substantial coverage, verifying that this thing exists and not much else. The article is overwhelmingly sourced to self-published posts on reddit and twitter, and I'm concerned that this has become a WP:COATRACK for WP:SELFPROMOTION which is a real abuse of Wikipedia for non-encyclopedic purposes. (That's the kindest way of putting it.) Shooterwalker (talk) 13:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.