Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BiteSquad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

BiteSquad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacking notability and depth of coverage. Media coverage primarily consists of routine corporate business (acquisitions, expansion of service areas) or PR/press-kits. Lack of sufficient independent editorial about the company. They may be notable in future, but I don't think they are yet. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:58, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: Nothing in the article provides a claim to notability and my searches are finding only routine coverage and social media. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete -- does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH; significant RS coverage not found. In general, WP:TOOSOON & corporate 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, I agree, I can't find significant coverage to make it pass WP:NCORP. Sam Sailor 11:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.