Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bite The Dust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Seems to exist... per AMG and others. If the article has incorrect information, that's not a reason to delete it. W.marsh 23:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Bite The Dust

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

no evidence of a single, deletion of how many times how many lies unnecessary Cusulli 13:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Zevizone 22:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Radio Airplay has already starting rising and radios have already stated it commercial release
 * Delete Unverified crystal balling. I think the deletion of How Many Times, How Many Lies most definitely is necessary, as it seems to be an article about something that never existed. -- Islay Solomon  |  talk  15:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Zevizone 15:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC) It shouldnt be deleted because lead pussycat doll confirmed it
 * Delete as crystal balling per Solomon. When it is finally released, then we can bring this back.   Buck  ets  ofg  19:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep User:cusulli 15:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC) It has a reputable source, a quoted magazine, what does Bite the Dust have? and anyway this duscussion is on deleting Bite the Dust. Please read the title.

Source? Country?


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.