Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitnation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Lourdes  03:53, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Bitnation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks like quite copied other website would be speedy or other reasons? ~ Junior5a   (Talk)   Cont  05:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


 * This is plagiarism, but not a copyright violation, so there is not rule against that on Wikipedia.--Prisencolin (talk) 06:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nomination. -- Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 15:12, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I have written this article. I have fixed the plagiarism, taking anything that I copied out of the article. If there is anything still in the article, let me know and I will fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Plechette Dey (talk • contribs) 04:58, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note - A quick google news browse is showing writeups in some indy RS non-trade-mag sources, especially german press. Copyright issues override any AFD issues.  That should be resolved first.    --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 07:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - a standard WP:BEFORE search turned up a plethora of good sources to use to fix this article. Starting with a mention in a CNN article about global passports, where the writer states "This could be the ultimate calling for start-ups such as BitNation, which has already begun issuing virtual IDs -- effectively digital passports -- using blockchain technology.".  Then more substantial coverage from International Business Times, from The Daily Telegraph, from Deutsche Welle, and a bunch more, and etc etc etc.  --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 14:51, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * keep meets WP:GNG--Prisencolin (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.