Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitredeconion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  21:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Bitredeconion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not independently notable. Not come across the name, but these are the first unnamed algebra generated by the Cayley–Dickson construction so should probably redirect there. The name is just something someone has made up. Not a reliable source, not even a correct source as the article says. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 03:57, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This term gets zero non-Wikipedia hits on the web or in GScholar. This looks like a neologism with zero uptake, so even a redirect is inappropriate. --Mark viking (talk) 21:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete There seems to be no independent source other than a personal webpage. Magidin (talk) 04:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.