Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitter Winter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Bitter Winter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to lack significant coverage, promotional Feoffer (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge into CESNUR seems the obvious thing to do. The issues with the sources can probably be fixed, but any notability of Bitter Winter probably comes on the back of the notability of CESNUR, therefore it makes more sense for Bitter Winter to be a section of the CESNUR article rather than an article in its own right. A1415 (talk) 11:49, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 September 14.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 02:14, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep or merge (as second choice). Hyperbolick (talk) 03:16, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - while most of the sources deal with human rights issues, some (China Digital Times, EU Reporter, Human Rights Without Frontiers, Radio Free Asia, La Stampa) deal directly with Bitter Winter and its work - I believe that is enough to satisfy WP:GNG - if not, then merge to CESNUR - Epinoia (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:40, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge into CESNUR. I don't see in-depth coverage from third-party reliable sources, only passing mentions here and there. -Zanhe (talk) 04:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has enough coverage and meets WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 12:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes the requirements at WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 19:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.