Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitterside


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. WjBscribe 02:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Bitterside
NB: The AfD has caused a fair bit of confusion, as a double listing was created on the same day. It was temporarily closed, and is now being relisted per DRV, speedily. The debate should not be closed until 20 September, as it is being relisted on the 15th, and it is unclear for how long it was ever open. Xoloz 11:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


 * – (View AfD) (View log) Search

Prior copyvio problems were cleared up to permit creation of the article. None of the information in the article is sourced. A reason for this seems to be that there is not enough reliable source material independent of Bitterside to create a attributable article. Google news brings up some information, but not enough for an article. --  Jreferee  (Talk) 02:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep (changed again) It appears this article has now been changed enough to deal with the copyvio issues, though the POV could still use some work. --Mud4t 04:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, actually, it's more of a keep. I can find a number of apparently independent reviews   publisher(?). Well, Malta's music scene is certainly not London's or New York's, but we shouldn't let the systemic bias prevail. I'm still not sure if copyvio issues are sufficiently addressed. Duja ► 15:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * KEEP I was the one that created the article. I found some information from different sites, and I managed to more or less change tha wording into my own way. So there is NO COPYVIO. Moreover the article satisfies the parameteres for the band being notable as you can see on the talk page JEPAAB 12:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Although the article still needs work to make it encyclopaedic, it does meet the requirements of WP:BAND WebHamste r  12:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.