Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitweaver (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Centrx→talk &bull; 23:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Bitweaver
This article has had two AFD nominations recently. The first resulted in a delete. It was recreated, and deleted as a repost. It was then the subject of a deletion review and subsequently relisted at AFD where it was again decided it should be deleted. The content has now been moved from TikiPro and is a stub. There was considerable work done on it during the last AFD listing and it was still eventually decided that it failed to meet WP:CORP. I don't see that this has changed in the last few weeks, so rather than have somebody spend time rewriting the article I suggest it is deleted. Yomangani talk 22:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, as mentioned previously, it's notable enough for a security warning and for Bob Young's company to be "stressing" it. Kappa 03:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for the fourth time and salt the earth. There are still no assertions of notability whatsoever in this article, much less any that would satisfy one of the three criteria listed in WP:CORP. Even the limited information that is there is not sourced by any references whatsoever, so fails WP:V. The two refs that Kappa supplies above are fairly trivial mentions that I do not believe substantiate notability. -- Satori Son 20:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable enough--Aldux 11:18, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.