Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitzer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, since last we heard, Wikipedia is not a genealogical database. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Bitzer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

As with other recent discussions, there is no evidence that this is a notable last name. A search shows only companies with that name and filtering for genealogy and associated research returns only false positives. While there are a number of (mostly red-linked) people with this name, there's no evidence that it's a notable name itself. WP is not a geneaology project and without any material to draw from, this cannot be anything but the currently existing OR. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 19:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:N as it has no reliable sources, which also means that it can't be verified. This is one of those examples of an article that is in bad shape, yet has no hint of notability or a possibility of this becoming a potential article.  Razorflame 03:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Razorflame. Stifle (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.