Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bivona & Cohen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:15, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Bivona &
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable insurance defense law firm; creator of page has worked only on this article and nothing else.  Eastlaw  talk ⁄ contribs 07:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nothing here that confers notability, I found nothing on a brief search, this seems like nothing but corporate advertising to me.  Ubelowme (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable law firm. --Artene50 (talk) 19:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.