Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BizSmart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Core desat 03:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

bizSmart
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This service of CIBC does not meet the notability criteria. It has not received significant coverage, and is a product of an organization (see: WP:PRODUCT). Furthermore, this service is no longer offered, and has left little impact on the banking compunity. Lex Kitten (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. While they may not be in business anymore, BizSmart was very notable. Reasons for nomination are wrong. J (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I can find no evidence of BizSmart being notable. The only articles I see are listing it's creation (in typical press-release style) or listing it's closure. I don't see how it is notable. If you think it deserves to stay, perhaps it could be merged into the CIBC article? Lex Kitten (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, no notability asserted. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Maybe they used to be notable, but there is no notability asserted.   jj137  ( Talk ) 01:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. At least an article like mbanx has a source indicating that it was North America's first virtual bank -- thus confering notability. There is nothing in this bizSmart article to suggest that the article subject was anything but an unsuccessful also-ran.  If, as claimed above, bizSmart "was very notable", we need to see something that shows it.  Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.