Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bizarre 64


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Bizarre 64

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a Google Books and major database search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 01:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  czar  01:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:PRODUCT. The only source I could find on software was this, which says "Why Bizarre-64, like the Commodore-64, ultimately failed - bad hardware". This website was also created by the man who created the software. Also no edits on page since 2009. EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 03:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unfortunately, I don't think this Commodore 64 BBS software ever really made it into reliable sources, and there's nothing archived on the Internet that I can find in the usual places, such as Google Books and Archive.org.  These sites have digital archives of many popular 8 bit computer magazines.  If we can locate offline sources, maybe the article can come back. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still questionable for the applicable notability, nothing currently convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  06:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.