Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Björn Djupström (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  So Why  07:42, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Björn Djupström

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

article fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC there are no in-depth sources in the artcle. Domdeparis (talk) 12:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment. I have completed this nomination on behalf of Domdeparis; the rationale above was originally posted at the 2013 AFD (Articles for deletion/Björn Djupström). On the merits, I have no opinion. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that! I nominated it using the page creation tool which didn't act as I'd expected! Domdeparis (talk) 13:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - the existing sources in the article are mainly Allmusic listings, which don't show notability. Per WP:BEFORE I made a good-faith search for sources; there are a few minor pieces in Swedish media about him, but I don't think they constitute WP:SIGCOV. Mostly it's trivial mentions, such as this listing of his name among other song writers or this text about a pop song he wrote; the only source I can find that is actually about Djupström is a short interview from 2010 for a Swedish regional radio channel. So he is definitely not "well-known" or "famous" by any stretch of the term. However, WP:NMUSIC point 1 says that a writer is considered notable if they have "credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition", and it turns out that he has co-written the song La La Love which appears to be notable. If the article is kept, a lot of cruft has to go, though. It was obviously written by a COI editor as a promo piece. --bonadea contributions talk 10:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep - per work mentioned in the article. It is obvious that he is working within the field. BabbaQ (talk) 00:43, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.