Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Boys Code


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 22:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Black Boys Code

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable subject lacking independent coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 14:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  03:33, 15 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG Ajf773 (talk) 04:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Organization article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. The only ref is a deadlink to a personal blog for a photographer. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Does not meet WP:NONPROFIT. Dialectric (talk) 16:57, 30 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.