Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Dagger Brotherhood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No Consensus to delete. Badly needs clean-up and third-party sourcing but as pointed out below those are not overriding reasons for deletion. Eluchil404 21:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Black Dagger Brotherhood

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

no external sources and reads a lot like an advertisement Will (talk) 23:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up. The books are ranked fairly high on amazon.com; the first one is #728, the second is #1093 and has a review from Booklist. Clarityfiend 02:04, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Having a sales ranking in the top 1000 range on amazon speaks for itself, but the nominator is correct, this definitely needs better third party sourcing.   Bur nt sau ce  18:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.