Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Diamond Capital Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:31, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Black Diamond Capital Management

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable company. It generates a little bit of commentary in trade press, but nothing more. The article rehashes the company's BS in a very close paraphrase, "employs investments that synthesize bottom-up credit analysis". Cabayi (talk) 10:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 10:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - As creator of this page, I came across Black Diamond at WP:RA. With the combination of trade/merger press and involvement in a significant lawsuit, I saw this company as certainly meeting general notability requirements. Meatsgains (talk) 16:40, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Would it help if I cut some of the "company's BS"? Meatsgains (talk) 16:45, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It would make the article more neutral, but it wouldn't fix the notability issue. I've always been wary of companies at WP:RA - there's a real risk of becoming a spammer's cat's paw or worse yet, their meat-puppet. Cabayi (talk) 07:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete GNG not met. What's with the sudden creation of all these non-notable business listing-style "articles"? Exemplo347 (talk) 16:44, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The company fails WP:CORPDEPTH and lacks sufficient references establishing notability. -- HighKing ++ 12:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete almost entirely sourced to incidental mentions, fails GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 15:43, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.