Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Diamond Income Fund


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 02:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Black Diamond Income Fund

 * — (View AfD)

I recommend Deletion for this article which is nothing but an advertisement for a non-notable company. The company primarily rents out trailers for the Canadian oil fields. The article has subsisted in the Wikipedia since August. It has no links to it except for the four redirect pages, which should also be deleted.
 * Black Diamond Income (redirect page)
 * Black Diamond Fund (redirect page)
 * Black Diamond Trust (redirect page)
 * Black Diamond Income Energy (redirect page) --Bejnar 00:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, because it doesn't seem to pass the corporate notability guideline - Google picks up a few things, but the sources don't seem independent of the company, thereby failing criteria 1. (And there's no way it meets #2 or #3.) Furthermore, the article is replete with advertising jargon, but lacks content. Finally, it's unsourced. Picaroon 01:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above as well as one of the only wikilinks is for a scottish trade unionist who died in 1965. ha.--Tainter 02:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:CORP. MER-C 03:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and above. WP:CORP. &mdash; Arjun 03:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There doesn't even appear to be a company website at all. -- SYCTHOS talk 03:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nom. ~ IICATSII punch the keys 10:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- fails WP:CORP.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 15:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added the fact that the company is traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, as well as the URL for the company's web site. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 19:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment That does not change anything with regard to notability does it? --Bejnar 21:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete- As per nom, non-notable corporations do not need Wiki articles.  Darth griz 98 20:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sci ence man 123  talk 21:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, I don't think being in the Toronto Stock Exchange guarantees you notability -  The   RSJ  (  Sign my book  ) (  CCD  ) 23:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N. No publications have been cited except routine sites like Yahoo Financeand this reference doesn't show a single article or analyst covering the company (headlines consist only of a single routine press release on earnings). Absent evidence that someone covers or writes about this company, WP:N isn't met. Can reconsider if sources demonstrating notability are produced. --Shirahadasha 03:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.