Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Eyes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-11 00:38Z 

Black Eyes

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Trivial info about a short-lived band. --Czj 05:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete hardly any notability. Fails WP:BAND -- KZ       Talk  •  Vandal  •  Contrib  06:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - Easily meets WP:BAND. You'll find plenty of articles about the band's 2nd album, Cough, if you just do a quick search, and there are even more if you look for pieces about the band more generally.  --notJackhorkheimer (talk / contribs) 14:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, released two albums on Dischord Records, who are practically the definition of WP:BAND's major independent label. Recury 15:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, their two albums were reviewed by Pitchfork Media and other music review websites, not to mention the aforementioned releases on Dischord. TheLetterM 16:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have performed general cleanup of the article, changing the formatting of one section, merging two sections together, and removing unsourced promotional statements and other unsourced statements tying the band (or its members) to other bands.  I have also added 4 reviews of the band's albums and 2 other sources for their history.  The band meets WP:N and the current version of the article mostly complies with WP:ATT and WP:NPOV.  -- Black Falcon 20:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.