Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Hole Horizon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Given the no consensus is between keeping and merging, and not deleting, it's time to close this after two weeks. Courcelles (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Black Hole Horizon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

not noteworthy/notorious enough, the art isnt exhibited anymore, and therefore the page doesnt proving info likely to be helpful to anyone, not even for historical purposes. This page seems like an outdated publicity for the art and the artist Manu de hanoi (talk) 10:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep notability doesn't expire once it's no longer on view. I see more than sufficient sourcing, including how it was the basis for further work when he was at MIT. That said, article does need clean up. Star   Mississippi  13:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * the "long term collab" with MIT lasted from 2019 to 2020 according to the "schedule" section in the link provided:
 * https://arts.mit.edu/people/thom-kubli/
 * are noises + soap bubbles noteworthy ?
 * https://vimeo.com/121111319?embedded=true&source=video_title&owner=5915740
 * This could easily be merged with the artist's page, plus the page title creates confusion with a real physical object of the same name (horizon of black holes) Manu de hanoi (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * think @Manu de hanoi is being a bit harsh with the "noises + soap bubbles" comment but agree that the article doesn't seem noteworthy enough and better suited for the artist's page. It's hard to find many external mentions about the sculpture via Google. Jacoblee628 (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete oops forgot to do the bolded thing Toobigtokale (talk) 23:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep, but either add a hatnote or a disambiguation page to avoid mixing up with the actual horizon of black holes (event horizon). I added a hatnote for now, we'll see if we should change it to a disambig - although there's no specific page for Event horizon of a black hole. Chaotic Enby (talk) 20:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge artist's work to artist's WP page. Note that most of the links here are to an exhibit in which this artist was one of many. This means that there is little that is substantial or specific to the work of Kubli in the sources in this article. Lamona (talk) 04:05, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Thom Kubli page. Fails GNG, Unneeded CFORK.  // Timothy :: talk  21:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, a well sourced work of art, and per Star Mississippi. None of the reasons in the good faith nomination are suitable for a deletion discussion. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.