Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Hole Quenchers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Looks rather spam-like. Note that I am inclined toward discounting Siva1979's opinion due to its seemingly monolithic, google-count form (i.e. elsewhere, too). As well, in future please use http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=%22your+search+query%22 as the url field (the one in your browser is too lengthy). Thank you. El_C 17:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Black Hole Quenchers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

NN thing i am doing this for someone else because there might be a conflict of interest so i am helping them out bye doing this for them they want to reach a comsence Oo7565 06:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per nomOo7565 07:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The information in this article is verifiable. Moreover a google search shows up quite a number of hits for this subject. In this webpage, there is also a definition of this term as well. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 07:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. There appears to be a COI with the article creator, but the subject itself appears to be verifiable and somewhat notable, taking into consideration the specialist nature of the topic. —AldeBaer 09:04, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  10:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Is this a description of a type of dye, or is this a trade name for a line of dyes by this particular company? There's a flavor of spam about this. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete this is one among many biology products, I strongly feel that having this article in wikipedia is a form of advertising. "SYBR Gold" and "Platinum Taq" are offhand examples of products that have an order of magnitude more google hits and yet do not merit their own wikipedia articles. If the company itself is notable enough to have a wikipedia page (which it doesn't), this product could be mentioned as a one-liner within. (And on that subject - Applied Biosystems is an offhand example of a more notable company that lacks a wikipedia page.) Madeleine ✉ ✍ 00:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spam for a tradenamed biomolecule, not especially notable (probably worthy of a sentence or two on the quencher article). Cquan (after the beep...) 14:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.