Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black King (Ultra monster)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Return of Ultraman. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Black King (Ultra monster)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This character does not establish notability independent of The Return of Ultraman through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 17:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Return of Ultraman.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 05:25, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect While a redirect is perhaps the best solution on policy grounds, as this does not meet notability standards, "Black King (Ultra monster)" is an unlikely search term and therefore I don't see a terribly high amount of merit to making it a redirect. Weighing the likelyhood that someone will search for "Black King (Ultra monster)" versus the likelyhood that someone will undo the merge later on without substantially improving the article and establishing notability, I believe deletion would be the best outcome.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  17:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That is a good point, actually...  Erpert  Who is this guy? 19:09, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Sven. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:25, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Preserve the functionality of the entry on the Black King dab page. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 11:14, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.