Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Like Me (1987)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. David Eppstein 04:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Black Like Me (1987)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article had an expired prod with concern "notability tagged for some time, we have no idea what sort of textbook this is: what grade level, what country/countries used in, if it is widely used, etc. In abscence of evidence to the contrary, I am assuming not wiki worthy". However, the article was previously prodded and the prod challenged, so cannot be deleted by that process. Procedural nomination, I abstain. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This was required reading at my high school (in the USA) so it's not just a UK thing. I realize that this is hearsay and not evidence, but I think it's a good indicator that it's the article that is the problem and not the topic. The fact that the book is sold in "School & Library Binding" indicates that there is a market for it in schools and libraries.  Maybe the fact that it was turned into a movie means something? ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 14:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I confused myself with the better known 1961 book by the same name. I withdraw my comments and I have no opinion in this debate. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 14:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Even in the best of cases, I can hardly see a full article arising about a "series of educational workbooks" ten years old.  --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)--jbmurray (talk|contribs) 04:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 01:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 01:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Notability (books) is the guideline here, and it looks like it does not pass. ~ Infrangible 02:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Infrangible. Valrith 20:54, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Seeing as how it's not even available on Amazon.co.uk, I don't see how it could possibly be notable. nadav (talk) 02:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.