Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Lives Matter (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Black Lives Matter (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Items are WP:PARTIAL matches and not ambiguous with "Black Lives Matter". They should not even be hatnotes per the guideline WP:RELATED. —Bagumba (talk) 10:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. —Bagumba (talk) 10:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Support the deletion of Black Lives Matter (disambiguation) per WP:PARTIAL, however there is not enough meaningful content to qualify the alternative for a hatnote as per WP:RELATED - unless you plan on creating a section under Black Lives Matter for Black Lives Matter Plaza... A short hatnote on Black Lives Matter for the plaza and the Movement for Black Lives is, in my opinion, necessary (even if it does bend the policy a little bit!). ItsPugle (talk) 10:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete When people are looking for BLM they obviously aren't looking for the likely temporary art installation in Washington D.C. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 22:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment the way that the page has been edited, I can see why it has been nominated for deletion. The idea for the disambiguation page came out of a discussion where someone thought that the page should be renamed Black Lives Matter (social movement) to distinguish it from the website and organization with the formal name Black Lives Matter. And it is also a bit confusing that there is a similar Movement for Black Lives.


 * I made some edits here. See what you think. I won't vote to oppose the deletion of the disambig page, but I think it would be nice to keep it because of the 1) social movement, 2) organization of the same name, and 3) similarly named Movement for Black Lives.–CaroleHenson (talk) 07:12, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If the movement and organization were deemed better as separate standlaone pages, then a dab might make sense (if a WP:HATNOTE wasn't sufficient) since they would be ambiguous. If the topics remain on the same page,  the Black Lives Matter page's lead and table of contents should make it obvious to the reader and easy to navigate; it's not the role of a dab to compensate for a disorganized primary topic page. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 08:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as it stands it isnt very helpful.  BLM isnt ambiguous.  It's amorphous. Rathfelder (talk) 10:46, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is only one article that could be described with the title "Black Lives Matter". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.