Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Lotus (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Level 3 Communications. --MelanieN (talk) 00:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Black Lotus (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The only source of this article is WP:SPA User:Ddosguru who is also the creator of this page and has been removing content from subject's rival company CloudFlare. This article clearly does not meets WP's notability standards for WP:COMPANY and has been created for vested corporate interests.--Badnaam (talk) 19:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:00, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge very selectively (I'm thinking about a sentence) to Level 3 Communications, the parent corporation. Sources offered or found do not demonstrate independent notability. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 16:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:33, 2 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Check your data. The company is clearly notable on many counts. Also, someone who isn't employed by any company in this industry cannot have a "vested corporate interest." My assumption would be that User:Badnaam is a competitor of these companies. Ddosguru (talk) 03:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 04:06, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.