Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Luster Soldier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 14:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Black Luster Soldier
Delete and protect. NN cruft. Three prior deletions, but none that would permit CSD G4, because consensus never reached. Let's reach it once and for all. - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. GassyGuy 14:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fancruft and a waste of space. It already has an article on the Yu-Gi-Oh! wiki, and does not contain enough worthwhile information to exist here. Setokaiba✌≝ 14:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Didn't I prod this? Speedy delete for article recreation. '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 15:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * G4 does not apply to recreated prods, it's a common fallacy. Re-read WP:CSD. - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah. Delete, regardless. '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 23:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Week-delete.... seems borderline to me. Was a character on the TV show in a few episodes... maybe a merge to the TV show would be in order? ---J.S (t|c) 22:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The problem with that argument is that there are hundreds of these "characters", as you put it, featured throughout the anime. Some are important enough for their own page (Dark Magician,Blue-Eyes White Dragon) because they have history, but most are like this one: they appear in 4 widely spread episodes and appear for about 5 minutes each. Is that notable? Setokaiba✌≝ 10:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and protect against recreation. Definite cruft. It's not notable enough for an article. As another choice, redirect to Yu-Gi-Oh and protect it. - Motor (talk) 13:44, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.