Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Necromancy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge; action to be taken by others. JERRY talk contribs 22:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Black Necromancy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Written like a fan site. Plus, it does not meet WP:NOTABILITY. Delete Metal Head (talk) 18:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, For consistency, I am also tagging and adding below related page on here.Tikiwont (talk) 10:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete both They have no context outside of the game. Yng  varr  10:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * merge both into necromancy, per http://books.google.com/books?id=50rZlhHCW20C&pg=PA126&lpg=PA126&dq=%22Black+Necromancy%22+%22white+necromancy%22&source=web&ots=Bdg2ekTVgy&sig=aLIiU-HE0txfxIWixANINKDxKyc#PPA129,M1
 * There is not enough to make two articles out of them, but they could be mentioned on necromancy. I see no problem in keeping a redirect from the current pages. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge both into Necromancy. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 15:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Both nominated articles explicitly refer to "the context of the Arcanum fantasy role-playing game", so I' suggest to clarify / confirm whether you see indeed mergbale content or if you merely eventually want to have a redirect.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge but into the article on the game, not the general one of Necromancy. The context of the description is the role of the concept in the game, not the subject in general. Clearly not enough for an independent article.DGG (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into article Arcanum (role-playing game). Don't merge into article necromancy, as that refers primarily to the concept in general (including in-the-real-world) as opposed to the concept in a particular RPG. --SJK (talk) 09:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.