Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Pope (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep/withdrawn after dab expansion-- JHunterJ (talk) 13:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Black Pope (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

With so few entries I suggest we can delete this, and put a hatnote to Anton LeVoy on the Black Pope article. PatGallacher (talk) 23:31, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

I meant put a hatnote to "Anton LaVey" on the article "Superior General of the Society of Jesus", which is where "Black Pope" currently redirects to. PatGallacher (talk) 23:35, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 00:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I was last involved 'many years ago' so 'whatever suits people.' Jackiespeel (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete This page only lists two articles. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 01:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep The page now lists six different terms that it can apply to. MarkZusab (talk) 22:28, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks like a valid DAB now. Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:53, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  02:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added and deleted a few entries, but seven is more than enough to justify a dab page. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep User:Lucifero4
 * Comment As nominator of this article, I now withdraw my nomination. This isn't that unusual, sometimes nominating an article for deletion can lead to it being improved enough to make it worth keeping. PatGallacher (talk) 22:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.