Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Roses (The Rasmus album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page except signature updates.  

The result was Result is Delete per WP:NOT''', the keep opinions did not address the issues. While this is by a notable artist, this album is not yet officially released, no prejudice against recreation once the album is released.'''. undefinedUntil 13:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Black Roses (The Rasmus album)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreleased album (crystal ballism) with little or no media coverage. Fails WP:MUSIC. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  21:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   — Hello, Control  Hello, Tony  21:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete for this being the 2nd Afd for this article, and per failing WP:MUSIC. ArcAngel (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Can you link the earlier AfD? I can't find it. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  22:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply Article was prodded by User:Neon white on November 23, 2007, reason given was "wikipedia is not a crystal ball, this is unconfirmed rumour and badly sourced". Prod removed by User:72.195.139.18 four days later. No reason was given for the removal. Article was prodded again by User:Hello Control today for the reason given in the AfD nomination above. Ironically, User:Neon white was the one to contest this second prod two hours later. This is the first time the article has been sent to AfD according to the article history and deletion logs (which are empty). Hers fold  (t/a/c) 23:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply Here's what I thought was the first Afd - ArcAngel (talk) 15:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to The Rasmus discography until seperate notability per WP:MUSIC is established. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 22:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep although the source is the bands website and this, i'm happy that this album will be released, therefore deleting seems pointless. -- neon white user page talk 05:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Being happy isn't really an argument for keeping it, even though that's probably not covered in WP:ATA. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  02:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - meets WP:MUSIC as an album by a notable artist; The Rasmus. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 10:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Notability is not inherited. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  12:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Please read MUSIC, specifically the second sentence. The article has sources proving that it will be released, so deleting now will mean the article will be created in a few months anyway. Or, just keep it now. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 22:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I see that the second sentence says "officially released albums may have sufficient notability". Two parts of that excerpt are important to note here: 1st, this album is not (yet) officially released (or even finished); 2nd, it says "may have sufficient notability", not "does". Without independent coverage notability isn't indicated. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  23:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.