Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Sabbath's Nineteenth Studio Album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. The consensus below is that "If the name and track order of a future album are not yet known, the album is very likely to have its page deleted from Wikipedia." Where have I heard that before? Eluchil404 (talk) 04:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Black Sabbath&
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article fails the criteria at WP:NALBUMS, WP:HAMMER and WP:CRYSTAL. The article's title is also an implausible search term, so it shouldn't just be redirected for the time being as is commonly done for future albums with officially confirmed titles. Fezmar9 (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Too early to keep. The album hasn't even been recorded yet. Mr. Metal Head (talk) 20:11, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Smash per WP:HAMMER. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:25, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge into a few sentences in the Black Sabbath article. This will doubtless be wp:notable, but it doesn't even have a name yet for the article title, and the content is small enough to merge for now. North8000 (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * What the hell is there to merge? Nothing's sourced or verifiable here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:06, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * There's actually more verifiable information at Black Sabbath than there is on this article. Fezmar9 (talk) 00:14, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Just plain speculation. No name, no release date, no track listing, no further more information, nothing. 76.191.133.247 (talk) 21:46, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge into the Black Sabbath article for now, and recreate when more info is available. There's a source here about them doing a new album, but nothing more concrete.  Lugnuts  (talk) 10:27, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as the content has already been mentioned in the "Reunion" subsection of Black Sabbath. The current revision of this article is just a few lines redundant, with no additional information provided. If more information has been revealed, rather than a few line as of now, then recreate the article. --G(x) (talk) 08:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete not because it isn't notable, but because there isn't any information not found at Black Sabbath. Once more information is available, then maybe an article should be created. Woknam66  talk James Bond 17:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - As more information becomes available add it to "Black Sabbath#Reunion (2010–present)" until a stub length is achieved.  Mlpearc   powwow  18:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, especially as WP:HAMMER is now so well accepted as to be de facto policy. Bearian (talk) 22:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.