Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Smoke Monster (Lost)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Mythology_of_Lost. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-27 01:52Z 

Black Smoke Monster (Lost)

 * — (View AfD)

Redundant of better-written Mythology of Lost, individual article is unnecessary, fits better in the main Mythology article. Language of new article is inferior to mythology section, new article uses words like 'seems' and 'appears to.' --  Wikipedical 02:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as nominator. --  Wikipedical 02:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Big  top  02:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sr13 02:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This article adds nothing that is not present in the other article mentioned in the nomination. Seventypercent 02:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Linking verbs make it inferior Mythology is superior And when I say that, I mean of Lost (of course) Get lost would be the best decision, or course! &laquo;TTV&raquo; (talk|contribs|email) 02:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Rillian 02:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Ned Scott 02:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect per nom. Delta Tango • Talk 02:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - SigmaEpsilon → &Sigma; &Epsilon; 16:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. --  ßott  e   siηi  (talk) 20:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete (yet again) as per everybody above.-- LeflymanTalk 02:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant.-- danntm T C 03:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant. Ter e nce Ong 06:53, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia needs more fan-cruft about TV series.  Maddy626 09:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That's a joke, right? -- LeflymanTalk 20:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and someone please close this discussion, its beginning to ooze black smoke... SkierRMH, 22:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.