Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black hole weapon

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. &middot; Katefan0(scribble) 03:16, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Black hole weapon
Delete per WP:NOR, for being original research. Only that "research" is a bit far-fetched here. --Pjacobi 20:19, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as or/crystal-balling. &mdash; brighterorange   (talk) 20:27, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR and WP:NOT. I can't think of a decent "put it in a black hole" pun, so if someone else would oblige... -Splash 23:20, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete--this article sucks. Meelar (talk) 00:10, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - this weapon was apparently used in Blade Runner, and is therefore a valid science fiction weapon. The real science of science fiction weapons is often speculative. -Lethe | Talk 00:56, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. If anyone wants to write a stub on the Blade Runner weapon, I'd be happy to keep, but this material shouldn't be allowed to stay. - Mgm|(talk) 08:06, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * delete: violates "original research"; articles on speculative proposals which have been widely discussed in the physics literature certainly have a place in Wikipedia, but this topic does not fit the bill. Let's delete this and if the original author wants to try again, he can write an article on the fictional "weapon" as suggested by other users above.---CH  (talk) 17:24, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.