Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black prints tomorrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete -FisherQueen (Talk) 20:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Black prints tomorrow

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable band, no claims of notability other than "they were on a radio show". No reliable sources to show notability as well. Wildthing61476 18:07, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, no claim of notability, nice fat clean zero on google, article created with db-band so qualifies as "author requests deletion". Weregerbil 18:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Actualy per this, it was speedied earlier and the author just copy and pasted the article with the tag. Wildthing61476 19:20, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:BAND. In all likelihood, a hoax. Precious Roy 19:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as db-repost since article was previously nuked. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 19:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Technically, it's not a violation of G4, as it wasn't deleted in an AfD. Reposted speedy deletions don't fall under CSD G4. Wildthing61476 19:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, they should be... Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 20:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong delete, especially since article was posted before and speedied before. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 20:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.