Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackett Janeiro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under G11 by Jimfbleak.(Non-administrator closure.) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Blackett Janeiro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't tell if this is a hoax or what. The website does not exist-it starts as a fictional character then as a living person??? Wgolf (talk) 23:24, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * -On a really odd note-on the new page feed it says: Created by Edwardlucas (talk | contribs) · 161 edits since 17 September 2014-article was created on September 16th! Yep somehow he registered AFTER this article was created? Wgolf (talk) 23:26, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Must be a New Pages Feed glitch because Edwardlucas has been editing since 2006:  Jinkinson   talk to me  01:24, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  23:32, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Must be-that is odd either way. Wgolf (talk) 01:26, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello Edward Lucas here. Blackett is a fictional character who will feature in my book on cybersecurity which is out next year. I have created his wikipedia page to illustrate the way in which reputation can be created and destroyed. I would be grateful if it were not deleted though I realise that this is a rather unusual case.... ˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwardlucas (talk • contribs) 08:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 6 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Slamdunk Delete: A fictional character from an unpublished book? Certainly by now the editor has to have understood that subjects have to demonstrate notability per WP:N as a prerequisite for an article, and that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a sociology experiment.  The book wouldn't be notable yet, never mind a character within it.  Nha Trang 20:22, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd support a speedy delete - this looks like a sociology experiment. Metamagician3000 (talk) 06:46, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes I can understand that -- I am sorry if I have breached Wikipedia rules. If you google him, he still exists! regards Edwardlucas (talk) 08:01, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Speedy delete as db-promo for upcoming book. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:26, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.