Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackstone Battery Codes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Blackstone Battery Codes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find any coverage in independent reliable sources about this subject, searching both the internet and Google Scholar. In addition to the primary sources cited in the article, I was able to find this press release, but that doesn't demonstrate notability. Does not meet WP:GNG. The initial editor also appears to have a conflict of interest, as their username invokes the name of the author of one of a provided primary source, and they appear to have side-stepped the AfC process after having the article rejected there. Finally, note that a significant amount of the article had a copyvio which I have removed, but there's enough content left over that it felt inappropriate to CSD on copyvio grounds. signed,Rosguill talk 21:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 21:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - not notable, all I can find are press releases and primary sources. ST47 (talk) 22:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --mikeu talk 06:29, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - very specific coding system, with no widespread notability. Onel 5969  TT me 11:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.