Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blade characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Damek (Blade character)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete all - three fictional characters from a failed television series. All are extended plot descriptions in violation of WP:PLOT. There are no reliable sources that discuss the real-world implications of these characters, because there are none, in violation of WP:GNG. These have been tagged for sourcing since December 2009. PRODs replaced with merge tags, but there is nothing to merge because there is no sourced information. Harley Hudson (talk) 23:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge carefully and check with sources. If you choose only Damek (Blade character) with the template find, you have nothing, with the followings it is better
 * (add Blade to narrow the results)
 * Some sources can be find to help writing and sourcing a paragraph for each character. I have in mind the section CSI: NY. I am agree with the lack of notability but I do not see a problem with a merge and a redirection. --Crazy runner (talk) 08:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * (add Blade to narrow the results)
 * Some sources can be find to help writing and sourcing a paragraph for each character. I have in mind the section CSI: NY. I am agree with the lack of notability but I do not see a problem with a merge and a redirection. --Crazy runner (talk) 08:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete all: None of the articles provides any reference so they all fail verifiability. The content is purely plot-only description of a fictional work. Even with a search engine test, none of the characters meets the general notability guideline. I have to agree with the nominator that, since no content is sourced within the articles, nothing is acceptable for a merge. Jfgslo (talk) 14:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Plot only. Not notable. Blake (Talk·Edits) 19:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Do not indiciate any notability. No predjudice against a merge, either. – Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 09:51, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.