Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blade of Awe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   02:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Blade of Awe
Fancruft. Artw 04:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Minor component of a game does not need its own article. Add a mention to the appropriate game article if need be, but, from my outsider's perspective, this one doesn't even have any useful content to be merged. GassyGuy 04:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per GassyGuy. Kukini 05:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, gamecruft, individual weapons don't need their own articles. J I P  | Talk 08:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Please people this is so much cruft. Wikipedia is not a game guide Ydam 11:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, cruft, it has no notability outside of the game. - Motor (talk) 12:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; This blade inflicts painful spelling, alas. &mdash; RJH (talk) 23:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to the game --Ephilei
 * Delete Individual video game weapons don't deserve articles unless they're well known, unique, influential (e.g. BFG 9000) or iconic to the series or even genre (e.g. Master Sword). Failing those, I think they should at least appear in more than one games of series, or risk being merged to main article and/or "List of weapons in Foo". And at very least you should be able to tell something interesting about the weapon, not just how many billion points of damage it does. As it stands, the article seems a bit poorly written and too GameFAQsy and it's unlikely it will grow beyond that. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.